• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • info@sciencewriting.net
  • Behance
  • Facebook
  • GitHub
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest

Science Writing

By Scientists For Scientists

  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Portfolio

Analysis and Synthesis in Research Writing

December 7, 2019 by Editor

Next Resource >>

Analysis and synthesis are opposite processes that work together to create strong research writing.

Next Resource >>

Bridging Analysis and Synthesis in Research Writing

Analysis and synthesis are opposite processes. An analysis is breaking an argument down into its components and evaluating its logic. Synthesis involves finding connections and links and evaluating their significance. These opposite processes work together. Without an accurate analysis of a paper’s argument, the synthesis of ideas and themes with multiple papers will be incorrect. We can use language as a bridge between analysis and synthesis, including verbs (Table 1), phrases, and sentences frames (Table 2).

Table 1. Verbs that bridge analysis and synthesis

Verbs for making a claimVerbs for expressing agreement
Argue
Assert
Believe
Claim
Emphasize  
Insist
Observe Remind
Report
Suggest 
acknowledge
admire
agree
celebrate
corroborate
corresponds
endorse
extol
praise
reaffirm
support
verify

Verbs for making recommendationsVerbs for expressing disagreement
Advocate
call for
demand
encourage
exhort
implore 
plead
recommend
urge
warn
complain
complicate
contend
contradict
deny
deplore
disavow
question
refute
reject
renounce
repudiate

Table 2. Phrase and sentence frames for talking about two sources (APA)

Phrases for explaining 
Basically, Silva (2018) is saying__________. 
Silva (2018) argues that ________________.
In other words, Silva (2018) observes______. 
Silva (2018) claims that ________________.
By offering this implication, Silva (2018)___.  
The essence of Silva’s (2018) argument is __.
Sentences frames for synthesis 
Silva’s (2018) primary claim is __________. Basically, Silva (2018) is saying__________. Harim (2020) corroborates this finding with __________. However, Harim (2020) complicates this finding with _________.  

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe

About Us

We are a team of scientists, led by our founder Genevive Bjorn, dedicated to helping scientists write better papers and proposals. We especially love graduate students because we feel the pain of learning the scientific writing process. This site is all about sharing with you what we wished we knew back then. Peace.

  • Behance
  • Facebook
  • GitHub
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest

Footer

About Us

Science Writing is a project by scientists for scientists. We work on a freemium business model and offer curated writing tools for every budget.

More About Us

Connect with Us

Address: PO Box 880536, Pukalani, HI 96788
Email: info@sciencewriting.net

  • Dribbble
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get the latest updates from our blog. We respect your privacy.

Copyright © 2025 · Bjorn & Associates LLC. All Rights Reserved.

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Portfolio
  • Blog